SYNTIA applies a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure publication quality and integrity.

Peer Review Workflow

1. Initial Screening
   The editorial board evaluates the manuscript for relevance to the journal’s scope and compliance with formatting guidelines.

2. Plagiarism Check
   Manuscripts are screened using trusted plagiarism detection software (maximum similarity allowed: 20%).

3. Double-Blind Review
   At least two independent reviewers evaluate the manuscript anonymously, ensuring objective and unbiased assessment.

4. Editorial Decision
   Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editor will issue one of the following decisions:
   Accept / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Reject

5. Final Proofreading and Layout
   After acceptance and revisions, the manuscript undergoes final editing, proofreading, and layout preparation before publication.

The average review period is 4–6 weeks.